Writing headlines for online editorial content can be a daunting task with conflicting advise.
On the usability side people like Jakob Nielsen argue that you must front load information scent in your headlines. The goal is to convey as much useful information on what the article will be about so the user can make an informed decision on whether that is the right page or not. However, these headlines often end up so dull that nobody wants to open the article at all (unless they already know and trust the source).
On the other hand, copywriters like Brian Clark claim that the purpose of a headline is to lure in visitors, e.g. “What Everybody Ought to Know About Writing Great Headlines” or “The Secret for Writing Better Blog Post Titles”. While intriguing, these headlines contain little information scent (and it’s almost never front loaded), and the content-to-noise ratio is often quite bad. In the first example 7 out of 9 words are ambiguous words that would fit any article.
One important thing to consider is that most people will read your headline outside the context of your site. Maybe they see it as a newsletter subject line in their mailbox, or maybe they find you in a search result, or they see your article re-tweeted on Twitter, or stumble upon it in a “useful resources” link collection, and so on.
This has a significant impact on how you should write headlines. In essence, your headlines must be meaningful outside the context of your site. So you can’t assume that people know your site is about “web usability”, or “bulldog breeding”, or “emerging markets”, etc. You have to make an effort to try to make you headline understandable without this context.
But how do you do this in practice if you also want an “attention grabbing” headline that spark interest? An approach we’ve found useful is the style of: [Context]: [Spark interest]
An example of this approach is one of our earlier articles titled “Form Field Usability: Avoid Multi-Column Layouts”.
If we’d written this headline entirely the copywriter’s way it might have been something like “The Little Told Secret of Why You Should Avoid Using Multi-Column Layouts”, which is certainly an interesting headline, but it also comes with some severe drawbacks:
By pre-fixing the headline with a context, you not only avoid ambiguity you also improve scannability.
Here’s some more examples of headlines we’ve previously written in this style:
Granted, this technique shouldn’t be your only writing style, but the next time you are writing a headline consider that it might be read outside your site’s context and give this method a try.
Do you have other ways of front loading information scent while keeping your headlines interesting?
Join 22,000+ readers and get Baymard’s research articles by RSS feed or
Topics include user experience, web design, and e-commerce
Articles are always delivered ad-free and in their full length
1-click unsubscribe at any time
Good ideas there, as usual. But I’m struggling to stay with you. You’ll find it easier to keep the attention of people who care about writing if you show us that you care abou it too. Proofread, proofread, proofread.
It’s a fair point.
Since we’re not native to the English language we make use of external proofreading services for our more static content (for example the sales page and about page) as well as for our usability report.
On the more frequently updated content channels – primarily these articles – you are, however, stuck with our own proofreading. This will certainly result in misspellings and poor grammar from time to time (okay, okay, let’s be honest: most of the time ;)
We do strive to make our arguments and observations as clear as possible, and this is our main measure of how well-written an article is. So if the meaning of our content is unclear, we have failed.
Hope this makes sense and I do thank you for your feedback, we will certainly try to improve in this area.
I think you guys are doing a great job. Looking forward to your next article :) And please don’t spend stupid money on proofreading your blogposts, just get them out there. Keep it human!
Terrific piece, Christian! Not only are you balancing ‘information’ and ‘lure’, you’re tending to ‘branding’ and ‘SEO’ as it reads professionally, but also naturally integrates keywords.
It certainly raises some interesting points and is well thought out.
Michael makes a good point with his “stupid” comment, and I’m happy to be reminded of it. However you write, if you are communicating effectively and creating a good experience for your target audience, you’re doing a great job. And knowing you are not native speakers of English raises my appreciation for you. Great job!
You can of course right different headlines for search and social than what appears in your article.
And in many ways you should.
Of course it’s yet another thing to do, but the long term results make it worth doing.
That way you please both uncle Jakob and cousin Brian.
Of course it also depends on if your CMS allows you to add extra fields.
© 2021 Baymard Institute US: +1 (415) 315-9567 EU: +45 3696 9567 firstname.lastname@example.org